Movie Reviews
5.2K Followers · 353 Items
Tory Burch iPhone 4 & 4S Case
Saved 3/11/11 to Movie Reviews

Jane Eyre: Needs More Fire


Multiple miniseries and movies have taken on Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre, so is another adaptation of the classic novel really necessary? Perhaps not, but director Cary Fukunaga's beautifully shot retelling is still a worthy addition to the previous versions of the tale. It stays loyal to Bronte's material while retaining the book's gothic soul.

Mia Wasikowska stars as the literary heroine, a governess at a sprawling but dreary estate called Thornfield Hall. The film begins when a distraught Jane flees Thornfield and is taken in by clergyman St. John Rivers (Jaime Bell). Though Jane won't tell John about her past or where she comes from, the audience sees all of it via flashbacks, beginning with Jane's difficult childhood under the watch of her cold-hearted aunt (Sally Hawkins). Fed up with Jane, the aunt sends her away to the strict Lowood charity school, where Jane grows up with little human connection. Once she's old enough, she lands the job at Thornfield under the aloof Edward Rochester (Michael Fassbender) and mysterious events begin to occur in the house. It's a lot of ground for the film to cover, but by encapsulating Bronte's story, we get more insight into Jane, instead of focusing on her relationship with Mr. Rochester. The downside is that their romance could have benefited from the extra attention and development.

Find out why it's worth seeing

Jane and Mr. Rochester's relationship gets off to a rocky start. Jane first meets him while walking through the Thornfield property; she spooks his horse, he falls, and the two have a brief interaction that's more abrupt than flirtatious. But Wasikowska and Fassbender's chemistry continues to have a difficult time getting off the ground as the film progresses. While they're excellent when verbally sparring — Jane's quick wit versus Rochester's harshness — the movie struggles to build the longing between them needed to get fully swept up in their melancholy love story.

Wasikowska embodies Jane with a mousy wig and bare face. As Jane, she's often quiet and pensive, but you can see the gears turning in her head as her feelings bubble beneath the surface. Fassbender on the other hand, isn't what you might expect from the Byronic Rochester; for one, he's much more handsome. Even so, Fassbender makes Rochester perfectly repellent and attractive at the same time. He's brash one minute, sympathetic the next, and dare I say, I found him more interesting than Jane. While the two actors together struggle to generate heat, Fassbender is often smoldering on his own.

Though Fukunaga could've played up the mystery of Thornfield more (Rochester's secret in the attic isn't nearly as intriguing as it should be), Bronte's gothic vibe is alive and well in the director's hands, and the scenery is gorgeously gloomy. As Jane plods through the sodden moors or stares out the window of Thornfield, you can feel her isolation and anguish. But I was left wishing that her romantic feelings and her happier moments were equally stirring.


Saved to

Movie Reviews

Tory Burch iPhone 4 & 4S Case Prada Vit Daino Double-Pocket Hobo Cop Out Kristen Bell(2013 Golden Globes Awards) The Man Behind Gollum : The Hobbit- Unexpected Journey Synopsis : Destiel E05-Cross Light at the Deadliest Stomping Ground  More Revelation: Destiel E05 - Cross Light at the Deadliest Stomping Ground
satinboutiquestore satinboutiquestore 1 year 16 weeks
Beauty
3 years 26 weeks
I absolutely loved this adaptation and thought the two leads had an amazing, smoldering chemistry. In my opinion, this is what set the movie a part from other Jane Eyre adaptations. I thought Mia was excellent, but I agree that Michael Fassbender was the key performance. He has such charisma in all of his roles. He's very talented and definitely an actor to watch.
3 years 27 weeks
My favorite screening is the one with William Hurt made by Zeffirelli...but I'm excited to see this one too
Lauren-Bradshaw Lauren-Bradshaw 3 years 28 weeks
Michael Fassbender definitely makes the film worth seeing, zeze. I loved his portrayal. I haven't seen Toby Stephens though, so I will definitely have to Netflix that!
Edie-J-Blige Edie-J-Blige 3 years 28 weeks
Great review! I'm looking forward to seeing it, but I kinda got the same impression from the trailer about the secret in the attic -- that it could have been played up more and been truly, gothically horrifying
zeze zeze 3 years 28 weeks
I'm so sad it wasn't great! I was really anticipating it. But I won't lie, the only thing I like about Jane Eyre is Rochester, so glad Michael Fassbender got it right. Buzz have you seen the BBC version with Toby Stephens? It's a really good version, I think. Toby Stephens was definitely not ugly, but Rochester shouldn't be ugly, that's fine in books, but on the screen, I want to see a hot guy-playing ugly.